Rule with an iron fist, we will bow – ARAB TIMES
Does Kuwait really adhere to a true democracy, as foreseen by the norms and theories developed for it and implemented in many countries, through which the society reaches the highest levels of its dynamics? Or was the current form in Kuwait forced upon us to join the United Nations, and taken just to prove that we are better than others?
To answer these questions, we must go back to the circumstances which prompted Kuwait to follow this system. In 1961, when the country gained independence from Britain, the then Soviet Union – an ally of the Iraqi regime of Abdul-Karim Qassem, supported its claim to annex Kuwait and went so far as to ‘to use its veto on Kuwait’s request to join the UN.
At that time, London advised Kuwait to have a constitution, an elected parliament and a government as a form of democratic rule. Therefore, the Constitutional Assembly embarked on the process of drafting a constitution. After a year-long deliberation in which every segment of society wanted a piece of the pie, this hybrid system was born.
This system is based on balances which have proven over time to weaken the State. It is clear that society was not prepared for it.
On February 8, 1963, the Iraqi regime of Abdul-Karim Qassem fell and the position of the Soviet Union changed. This led to Kuwait’s accession to the United Nations on May 14 of the same year, which was also recognized by the new Iraqi regime.
This transformation meant the disappearance of the external danger, but in turn, it contributed to the emergence of an internal danger which manifested itself a year later in the infamous crisis of 1964.
Since then, flaws began to appear in the new system. It culminated in the 1967 election, which turned out to be a time bomb that exploded in everyone’s face. There was massive electoral fraud that took place through the buying of votes and nominating candidates on the basis of tribal and sectarian prestige.
Nine years later, these electoral loopholes led to another crisis, which was the unconstitutional dissolution of parliament in 1976. Instead of tackling the causes, each party stepped up things until they came to an end. an impasse in 1986. Thus, the parliament was dissolved for the second time. time and the constitution was suspended.
The lesson of the brutal Iraqi invasion was very harsh and historic. Instead of learning from this lesson and working to address all the loopholes that led to this disaster, the quota system has prevailed in its worst forms, not only in the National Assembly and the government, but even in the smaller jobs. This has led to widespread corruption, state desecration and emirate domination.
The case escalated and paved the way for serious attempts to overthrow the government in 2012, storming the National Assembly building, pressuring justice through sit-ins and by questioning its integrity. It all looked like an internal invasion rather than the exercise of freedom of opinion, expression and democracy.
Such events or rather incidents have led to the regression of the state at all levels, the absence of projects and the submission of the government to parliamentary blackmail, which ultimately led to the miserable situation we are living in now.
Instead of showing determination, some advisers have stepped forward to call for a national dialogue, which means giving in to outlaws and not holding them accountable.
To be frank, what is required is not a dialogue with them, but firmness in governance, which the Kuwaitis are looking for even if it reaches an extreme severity, because then everyone will bow in the obedience.
As for this reprehensible call, it will be the beginning of the collapse of the state, as it is seen as the pinnacle of concessions to the Constitution and the law.
Perhaps we should learn from Tunisia where President Kais Saied made bold and resolute decisions that halted the advance of the Muslim Brotherhood group over the country’s resources, and their hijacking of the state under the pretext of democracy. , which worsened the situation and further impoverished the people. .
By Ahmed Al-Jarallah
Editor-in-Chief, The Arab Times